<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AI Security Engineer on Reputo | Career Guide for Students</title><link>https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/</link><description>Recent content in AI Security Engineer on Reputo | Career Guide for Students</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI Hiring Fairness Auditing: A New Frontier for AI Security Engineers</title><link>https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/specializations/ai-hiring-fairness-audit/</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/specializations/ai-hiring-fairness-audit/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-field-matters">Why This Field Matters&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>A Stanford HAI study released in May 2026 examined more than 4 million applications across 156 employers, and the picture was uncomfortable. Roughly 26% of Black applicants and 15% of Asian applicants applied to positions where an AI hiring tool produced outcomes that would trigger federal adverse-impact scrutiny. The deeper problem was structural, not anecdotal. Because many firms screen candidates through a single vendor&amp;rsquo;s model — a phenomenon researchers call &amp;ldquo;algorithmic monoculture&amp;rdquo; — a person rejected at one company is likely to be rejected at others. One model&amp;rsquo;s blind spot becomes a wall across an entire labor market. With roughly 90% of U.S. firms now using some form of AI screening, someone has to take these systems apart and test them. NYC&amp;rsquo;s Local Law 144 already requires independent bias audits of automated employment decision tools, the EEOC has prioritized &amp;ldquo;algorithmic fairness&amp;rdquo; in its 2024–2028 enforcement plan, and the EU AI Act classifies hiring tools as high-risk. The regulatory floor is rising, and the auditors are scarce.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Agent Data Leakage Prevention Engineer</title><link>https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/specializations/agent-data-leakage-prevention/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/specializations/agent-data-leakage-prevention/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="1-about-this-specialization">1. About This Specialization&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>An &lt;strong>Agent Data Leakage Prevention Engineer&lt;/strong> builds the defenses that stop autonomous LLM agents from leaking the secrets, internal documents, and personal data they are trusted to handle. Within AI security, if a red teamer proves weaknesses by attacking, this specialization stands on the opposite side. You design guardrails, isolate context, and put DLP (data leakage prevention) on everything an agent emits.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The scale of the problem became concrete with &lt;strong>MosaicLeaks&lt;/strong>, a benchmark ServiceNow released in June 2026. Measuring 1,001 multi-hop research chains where deep-research agents combine local enterprise documents with web retrieval, the base model (Qwen3-4B) leaked private information through its external query logs alone in 34.0% of cases. The next finding is the alarming one: tuning purely for task performance via reinforcement learning raised accuracy from 48.7% to 59.3% — but pushed leakage up to 51.7%. Teaching the agent to do better made it leak more. ServiceNow&amp;rsquo;s Privacy-Aware Deep Research (PA-DR) method held accuracy at 58.7% while cutting leakage to 9.9%. Closing exactly that gap is what this role exists to do.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Agent Governance: The AI Security Engineer's Control Plane</title><link>https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/specializations/agent-governance-control-plane/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/specializations/agent-governance-control-plane/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-field-matters">Why This Field Matters&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Once agents stop being demos and start doing real work, it becomes obvious that someone has to keep them in line. Where a person used to click the button, you now have software that calls its own tools, queries databases, and approves payments on its own. When it works, it feels like magic. When it goes sideways, accountability evaporates. Who took that action, under what authority, on what basis? Without a system that can answer those questions, agents simply cannot ship in a regulated industry — the deployment never gets approved in the first place.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>AI Red Team Specialist</title><link>https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/specializations/ai-red-team-specialist/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://reputo.net/en/jobs/ai-security-engineer/specializations/ai-red-team-specialist/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="1-about-this-specialization">1. About This Specialization&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>An &lt;strong>AI Red Team Specialist&lt;/strong> evaluates LLM and AI systems from a real attacker&amp;rsquo;s perspective. This includes AI-specific attack vectors: prompt injection, jailbreaking, model extraction, training data leakage, and agent chain attacks — combining automated tools like XBOW, Garak, and PyRIT with manual analysis.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Demand for this specialization exploded in 2026, when Anthropic Mythos found 271 vulnerabilities in Firefox 150. In an era when AI does security testing, people who can verify the security of the AI itself and use AI-powered attack tools defensively became essential.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>